Protection and Management Plan for the Millbrook Marsh Nature Center
![]()
Stream Fauna
Stream Macroinvertebrates
Both Thompson Run and Slab Cabin Run support a moderately depauperate macroinvertebrate fauna. Midge larvae (Chironornidae) and blackfly larvae (Simuliidae) were the most common taxa in Thompson Run, while chironomids and hydropsychid caddisflies were most common in Slab Cabin Run (Tables 1 and 2). Slab Cabin Run had a richer invertebrate fauna, with an average taxa richness of 17.2, as compared to 11.0 in Thompson Run.
REP Ill showed slight to moderate disturbances in the macroinvertebrate community (Table 3). MI stations except Station 2 were "Moderately impaired," while Station 2 was "Slightly impaired." The scrapers/ftlterers, EPT/Chironomidae, and % dominant taxon indices suggest a generally unbalanced community. Low values for scrapers/filterers at all stations except Station 4 indicate a predominance of filtering collectors and suggest a disproportionate amount of fine particulate organic matter suspended in the water column. An overabundance of pollution-tolerant chironomids was shown by the BPT/Chironomidae index. The most dominant taxon made up a large portion of the total macroinvertebrate assemblage at each station (% dominant taxon). Ideally, the most dominant taxon should contribute less than 20% to a healthy, balanced macroinvertebrate community.
|
July 1997 |
October 1997 |
|||||||||||||||||||||||
|
Thompson Run |
Slab Cabin Run |
Thompson Run |
Slab Cabin Run |
|||||||||||||||||||||
|
Station |
1 |
5 |
6 |
2 |
3 |
4 |
1 |
5 |
6 |
2 |
3 |
4 |
||||||||||||
|
Insecta |
||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
Ephemeroptera |
||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
Baetidae |
||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
Baetis sp. |
23 |
8 |
20 |
16 |
2 |
3 |
51 |
21 |
22 |
7 |
8 |
3 |
||||||||||||
|
Heptageniidae |
||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
Stenonema sp. |
15 |
|||||||||||||||||||||||
|
Tricorythodae |
||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
Tricorythodes sp. |
3 |
|||||||||||||||||||||||
|
Trichoptera |
||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
Glossosomatidae |
||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
Glossosoma sp. |
1 |
|||||||||||||||||||||||
|
Hydropsychidae |
1 |
4 |
||||||||||||||||||||||
|
Ceratopsyche sp. |
4 |
9 |
123 |
57 |
11 |
1 |
57 |
77 |
3 |
|||||||||||||||
|
Cheumatopsyche sp |
4 |
20 |
2 |
2 |
3 |
|||||||||||||||||||
|
Hydropsyche sp. |
1 |
2 |
18 |
2 |
29 |
6 |
3 |
|||||||||||||||||
|
Hydroptilidae |
||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
Hydroptila sp. |
1 |
|||||||||||||||||||||||
|
Ochrotrichia sp. |
2 |
3 |
3 |
4 |
8 |
2 |
||||||||||||||||||
|
Limnephilidae |
||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
Pycnopsyche |
1 |
|||||||||||||||||||||||
|
Psychomyiidae |
||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
Psychomyiia sp. |
5 |
|||||||||||||||||||||||
|
Rhyacophilidae |
||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
Rhyacophila sp. |
2 |
|||||||||||||||||||||||
|
Diptera |
||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
Ceratopogonidae |
||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
Forcipomyia sp. |
4 |
|||||||||||||||||||||||
|
Chironomidae |
96 |
131 |
161 |
45 |
88 |
156 |
158 |
196 |
139 |
32 |
85 |
56 |
||||||||||||
|
Empididae |
||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
Chelifera sp. |
1 |
|||||||||||||||||||||||
|
Muscidae |
15 |
2 |
7 |
9 |
11 |
4 |
1 |
2 |
||||||||||||||||
|
Nymphomyiidae |
||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
Nymphomyiia sp. |
1 |
|||||||||||||||||||||||
|
Station |
1 |
5 |
6 |
2 |
3 |
4 |
1 |
5 |
6 |
2 |
3 |
4 |
||||||||||||
|
Simuliidae |
143 |
103 |
72 |
2 |
138 |
5 |
67 |
65 |
113 |
8 |
55 |
24 |
||||||||||||
|
Tabanidae |
1 |
|||||||||||||||||||||||
|
Chrysops sp. |
6 |
|||||||||||||||||||||||
|
Tipulidae |
||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
Antocha sp. |
2 |
4 |
44 |
4 |
3 |
1 |
2 |
16 |
28 |
7 |
||||||||||||||
|
Tipula sp. |
1 |
2 |
2 |
1 |
||||||||||||||||||||
|
Coleoptera |
||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
Dytiscidae |
||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
Agabus sp. |
1 |
|||||||||||||||||||||||
|
Elmidae |
||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
Dubiraphia sp. |
2 |
1 |
7 |
3 |
6 |
|||||||||||||||||||
|
Optioservus sp. |
7 |
1 |
42 |
36 |
2 |
5 |
||||||||||||||||||
|
Stenelmis sp. |
2 |
14 |
2 |
|||||||||||||||||||||
|
Psephenidae |
||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
Ectopria sp. |
1 |
1 |
||||||||||||||||||||||
|
Psephenus sp. |
21 |
1 |
15 |
|||||||||||||||||||||
|
Hemiptera |
1 |
|||||||||||||||||||||||
|
Corixidae |
||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
Trichocorixa |
1 |
|||||||||||||||||||||||
|
Crustacea |
||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
Amphipoda |
||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
Gammaridae |
||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
Gammarus minus |
2 |
9 |
3 |
3 |
2 |
3 |
2 |
|||||||||||||||||
|
Talitridae |
||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
Hyalella azteca |
6 |
|||||||||||||||||||||||
|
Decapoda |
1 |
|||||||||||||||||||||||
|
Isopoda |
||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
Asellidae |
||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
Asellus sp. |
6 |
8 |
1 |
19 |
9 |
12 |
||||||||||||||||||
|
Turbellaria |
2 |
9 |
||||||||||||||||||||||
|
Tricladida |
||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
Planariidae |
1 |
5 |
2 |
1 |
||||||||||||||||||||
|
Station |
1 |
5 |
6 |
2 |
3 |
4 |
1 |
5 |
6 |
2 |
3 |
4 |
||||||||||||
|
Cura foremanii |
2 |
47 |
||||||||||||||||||||||
|
Hymanella retenuova |
10 |
1 |
||||||||||||||||||||||
|
Oligochaeta |
14 |
18 |
23 |
3 |
10 |
11 |
11 |
13 |
1 |
15 |
155 |
|||||||||||||
|
Gastropoda |
3 |
|||||||||||||||||||||||
|
Basommatophora |
||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
Physidae |
1 |
1 |
1 |
2 |
||||||||||||||||||||
|
Planorbidae |
2 |
1 |
2 |
|||||||||||||||||||||
|
Bivalvia |
||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
Veneroida |
3 |
|||||||||||||||||||||||
|
Pisidiidae |
9 |
|||||||||||||||||||||||
|
Pisidium sp. |
1 |
2 |
||||||||||||||||||||||
|
Total |
300 |
304 |
305 |
302 |
308 |
300 |
301 |
317 |
306 |
300 |
305 |
305 |
||||||||||||
|
Species Richness |
11 |
17 |
11 |
16 |
10 |
21 |
8 |
9 |
10 |
19 |
19 |
18 |
||||||||||||
26
| Raw Scores: |
Stations |
||||||
|
1 |
2 |
3 |
4 |
5 |
6 |
Ref |
|
|
Taxa Richness |
11 |
16 |
10 |
21 |
17 |
11 |
19 |
|
Modified 11131 |
5.91 |
4.18 |
5.49 |
5.46 |
5.59 |
5.86 |
4.05 |
|
Scrapers/Filterers |
0.18 |
0.36 |
0.02 |
1.73 |
0.08 |
0.24 |
30.50 |
|
EPT/Chironomidae |
0.26 |
3.80 |
0.81 |
0.26 |
0.12 |
0.21 |
1.46 |
|
% Dominant Taxon |
47.67 |
40.73 |
44.81 |
52.00 |
43.09 |
52.79 |
36.20 |
|
EPT Index |
2 |
7 |
4 |
6 |
4 |
4 |
10 |
|
Community Loss Index |
1.27 |
0.94 |
1.30 |
0.57 |
0.71 |
1.18 |
-------- |
Percent Comparison to Reference:
|
Taxa Richness |
57.89 |
84.21 |
52.63 |
110.53 |
89.47 |
57.89 |
------ |
|
Modified HBI |
68.53 |
96.89 |
73.77 |
74.18 |
72.45 |
69.11 |
------ |
|
Scrapers/Filterers |
0.59 |
1.18 |
0.07 |
5.67 |
0.26 |
0.79 |
------ |
|
EPT Chironomidae |
17.81 |
260.27 |
55.48 |
17.81 |
8.22 |
14.38 |
------ |
|
% Dominant Taxon |
47.67 |
40.73 |
44.81 |
52.00 |
43.09 |
52.79 |
------ |
|
EPT Index |
20.00 |
70.00 |
40.00 |
60.00 |
40.00 |
40.00 |
------ |
|
Community Loss Index |
1.27 |
0.94 |
1.30 |
0.57 |
0.71 |
1.18 |
------ |
Biological Condition Scores:
|
Taxa Richness |
2 |
6 |
2 |
6 |
6 |
2 |
6 |
|
Modified HBI |
2 |
6 |
4 |
4 |
4 |
2 |
6 |
|
Scrapers/Filterers |
0 |
0 |
(I |
(I |
0 |
0 |
6 |
|
EPT Chironomidae |
0 |
6 |
4 |
() |
(I |
(I |
6 |
|
% Dominant Taxon |
0 |
0 |
(I |
(I |
(I |
(I |
2 |
|
EPT Index |
0 |
2 |
C) |
C) |
0 |
C) |
6 |
|
Community Loss Index |
4 |
4 |
4 |
4 |
4 |
4 |
6 |
|
Totals |
8 |
24 |
14 |
14 |
14 |
8 |
38 |
|
Bioassessment (level of impairment: |
Moderate |
Slight |
Moderate |
Moderate |
Moderate |
Moderate |
Not Impaired |
27
The number of generally pollution-intolerant taxa (mayflies, stoneflies, and caddisflies) was low at all stations (EPT index). The Hilsenhoff Biotic Index (HBI) suggests that all stations except Station 2 are affected to some degree by organic pollution. Intermediate values of the Community Loss Index at all stations indicate moderate dissimilarity from the reference station.
Lipton (1998) compared macroinvertebrate communities for samples collected in 1997 during this study with those collected about 20 years ago. Although the location of sampling sites varied, the ecological integrity of these biological communities in the Millbrook streams appears to be similar, perhaps slightly better. The earlier samples were collected before the University’s sewage treatment plant cased discharging into Thompson Run in 1983, so the macroinvertebrates were subjected to a higher load of organic pollution. More recently, increasing stormwater discharges may have prevented further recovery. Overall, the aquatic macroinvertebrate communities have remained slightly to moderately impaired. These conditions are unlikely to improve unless significant reductions in stormwater quantity and improvements in stormwater quality occur in the portions of the Spring Creek watershed that are upstream of Millbrook Marsh.
Fish.
Wild brown trout (Salmo trutta), rainbow trout (Oncorhynchus mykiss), white suckers (Catostomus commersoni), and slimy sculpins (Cottus cognatus) were found in both Thompson Run and Lower Slab Cabin Run (Tables 4, 5, 6, and 7). Wild brown trout, white suckers, blacknosed dace (Rhinichthys atratulus), and creek chubs (Semotilus atromaculatus) were found in Upper Slab Cabin Run (Tables 4, 5, 6, and 7).
Density and biomass estimates were made for brown trout only. Rainbow trout were either not captured during both electrofishing passes (Upper Slab Cabin Run), not captured on the second pass (Thompson Run), or only one was captured on the second pass (Lower Slab Cabin Run). Density and biomass estimates of brown trout were highest in Thompson Run (4800/ ha, 423 kg/ha; Table 5), followed by Lower Slab Cabin Run (983/ha, 106 kg/ha; Table 6) and Upper Slab Cabin Run (761/ha, 106 kg/ha; Table 7). Recruitment of young-of-the-year (1997) fish was good in all 3 stream reaches, as evidenced by the first peak in length-frequency distribution of fish 139 mm and smaller (Fig. 2). A gap in fish 139-169mm long (1 year olds) indicates poor recruitment during 1996, most likely due to the severe flooding that occurred early that year.
Fig. 2. Length-frequency distributions for brown trout from
(a) Thompson, (b) Lower Slab
Cabin, and (c) Upper Slab Cabin Runs (Files TR97.WD4, SCRD97.WK4, SCRU97.WK4).
Table 4, Table 5, and Table 6 combined into Electrofishing data for (a) brown and (b) rainbow trout from Thompson Run – August 8 and 11, 1997, Run 1, August 14, 1997, Run 2, File TR97.WK4; (a) brown and (b) rainbow trout from Lower Slab Cabin Run – August 5 and 7, 1997, Run 1, August 14, 1997, Run 2, File SCRD97.WK4; (a) brown trout from Upper Slab Cabin Run – August 7 and 8, 1997, Run 1, August 14, 1997, Run 2, File SCRU97.WK4
(a)1997 Electrofishing Data for Brown Trout in Millbrook Marsh Streams
|
Brown Trout |
|||||||||||
|
Thompson Run |
Lower Slab Cabin Run |
Upper Slab Cabin Run |
|||||||||
|
Length Group (mm) |
Total caught (N) |
Mean Weight (g) |
g*N (kg) |
Total caught (N) |
Mean weight (g) |
g*N (kg) |
Total caught (N) |
Mean weight (g) |
g*N (kg) |
||
|
60-69 |
4 |
0 |
0.00 |
||||||||
|
70-79 |
8 |
4 |
0.16 |
3 |
4 |
0.02 |
13 |
4 |
0.09 |
||
|
80-89 |
39 |
7 |
1.38 |
20 |
7 |
0.26 |
22 |
7 |
0.26 |
||
|
90-99 |
40 |
14 |
2.83 |
33 |
14 |
0.84 |
17 |
14 |
0.41 |
||
|
100-109 |
51 |
16 |
4.13 |
22 |
16 |
0.64 |
10 |
16 |
0.27 |
||
|
110-119 |
38 |
18 |
3.46 |
5 |
18 |
0.16 |
1 |
18 |
0.03 |
||
|
120-129 |
11 |
20 |
1.11 |
2 |
- |
- |
1 |
- |
- |
||
|
130-139 |
4 |
25 |
0.51 |
0 |
0 |
0.00 |
0 |
0 |
0.00 |
||
|
140-149 |
0 |
0 |
0.00 |
0 |
0 |
0.00 |
1 |
0 |
0.00 |
||
|
150-159 |
1 |
41 |
0.21 |
1 |
40 |
0.07 |
0 | ||||